The topic I wished to explore was the H1N1 influenza. Moreover, I figured a controversial aspect of this topic was the vaccination that was created for this strain of flu. However, the issue with this vaccine is that serious adverse effects have been reported in some who have received it. Consequently, I want to pursue whether Amercians perceive the H1N1 influenza vaccination to be beneficial or harmful. And after conducting a bit of research, with more to be performed, I believe that Americans believe the vaccination to be helpful because they are not properly informed of the negative effects that it may cause.
My topic and question is relevant to everyone living in the United States because it is undeniable that everyone is susceptible to catching this strain of influenza; consequently, Americans must be informed of the best ways to protect themselves from this virus.
Broder, K., et al. “Safety of Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccines — United States, October 1-November 24, 2009.” MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report 58.48 (2009): 1351-1356. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 28 Jan. 2010.
The authors of this article explain that steps are being taken to properly monitor the effects associated with the H1N1 and seasonal influenza vaccines while also listing the statistical data that has aleady been gathered. The authors provide two charts to clearly provide the raw data about the adverse effects that have been obtained while also explaining the fuctions of VAERS, VSD, and the problems associated with ach of these organizations and reporting. The writers produced this article in order to keep other medical professionals informed about the effects of these vaccinations as well as to inform them that the data may not be entirely accurate. The intended audience of this article are fellow educated members of the health community who are monitoring the safety of these vaccinations.
“CDC Estimates of 2009 H1N1 Influenza Cases, Hospitalizations and Deaths in the United States, April-December 12, 2009.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 15 January, 2010. Web. 27 January, 2010. <http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/estimates_2009_h1n1.htm>.
The writers of this online article suggest that the estimates for the H1N1 influenza in the United States may be highly under reported but argue that the CDC has developed a method that accounts for this underreporting to provide statistics on this epidemic, which is also shared. By including a chart of the estimated cases of H1N1 influenza by age group, cases, hospitalizations, and deaths between April and December 12, 2009, and defining the method that the CDC has undertaken to create these estimates, the authors justify their argument. The writers of this web article share this information in order to make the public aware of how the H1N1 has impacted the United States thus far and to justify how these statistics are obtained. The intended audience for this source is the mass educated public.
“Use of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2009.” MMWR Recommendations & Reports 58.RR-10 (2009): 1-7. CINAHL with Full Text. EBSCO. Web. 28 Jan. 2010.
The composers of this journal article suggest that all people should receive the H1N1 influenza vaccine while also providing a brief background of the pandemic. The writers justify this claim by explaining the history of the novel influenza A, contrasting the H1N1 and seasonal flu, and then supporting the ACIP’s statement that everyone should be vaccinated. The authors produced this article in order to help prevent the spread of this pandemic and to inform the public that it is extremely beneficial to receive the novel influenza A vaccination. The intended audience for this journal article is once again the educated public.
